fbpx
Connect with us

Ethical Tech

Social Media Forces an Alternate Reality for the Future’s Generation

Published

 on

When social networking titan Facebook emerged to the scene back in 2004, no one predicted the global and social overtake of what soon became a digital and societal phenomenon. The impact this company had on a worldwide scale presented to other social networking companies, such as Twitter, Snapchat, and LinkedIn, the needed means to flourish along the way, and deliver the needed means to create an alternate reality.

Deemed the King of Social Media, Facebook hit its one billion monthly active user mark in 2012, and with that came the primal ascend to power of these platforms. Fast forward to 2019, the Big Tech giant’s three owned networking platforms, Instagram, Messenger, and WhatsApp, took the lead as the year’s most downloaded applications.

From there, the social dynamic between people was significantly altered. These platforms delivered to individuals the option of building connections from the comfort of their devices, resulting in a fundamental reshaping of social interactions between people.

“Social media connects almost half of the entire global population. It enables people to make their voices heard and talk to people across the world in real-time. However, it also reinforced prejudices and sowed discord, by giving hate speech and misinformation a platform, or by amplifying echo chambers,” according to the United Nations’ report.

Technology is well on its way to changing the social structure of communities. For example, anyone who grew up with the emergence of digital development has experienced a subliminal restructure of their cerebral behavior and societal interactions.

And this is only the tip of the iceberg.

The increased devotion towards social media has left the world in a simultaneous state of dysfunction and intertwine. If we take a deeper look into what lies behind our smart devices and computers, we will find war is on the rise.

Not a violent one, but a dangerous one, nonetheless. The race to obtain users’ attention is what drives these companies to reach a higher level of success, and said attention, fuels their platforms. Their structured business model places the viewer as the product, rather than the consumer.

And what sustains this model? The humanitarian aspect of our psyche.

By observing human habits, some of the leading social media companies, such as Facebook and its sister platforms, alongside Twitter, and others, managed to weaponize our minds against us to sustain the subliminal addiction to social media by turning to industrial psychology to obtain their desired means.

Using psychology to manipulate the scenario to their benefit seems critically unfair, especially since we, as “consumers” are far from being aware of the detrimental effect this holds on our growth as people and societies.

As adults, this abuse and ethical breach of our rights may not hold the same damaging outcomes, as much as it has on kids.

Let’s draw a mental image for a second of a teenager, laying on their bed, scrolling through one of these platforms. Let’s choose Instagram for this specific case – given that adults’ usage of this networking platform varies than that of teens.

According to researchers at the College of IST, their research highlighted “that teens have a much higher level of self-disclosure on the internet.” Yet, what does this mean?

First, let us take it by the one thing that doesn’t deceive. The numbers.

More than 90 percent of Instagram users are less than 35 years old, with teens’ age margins ranging between 13 and 19 years old. Teenagers were found to post more photos of their lives than adults. This can be driven by two hypotheses: they have a limited resource to explore the outside world, contrary to adults. Or Instagram might be triggering subliminal psychological issues stopping them from highlighting a certain aspect of their lives, according to the College of IST.

Teens who grew up with the endless characteristics the internet provides us are heavily influenced by both the positive and negative effects of social media.  

These platforms influence diversified segments, especially a brain that is still in its growing phase. Instagram and similar networking platforms lead to activation of brain circuity implicated in reward. It is deceptively connected to the experience of receiving likes and positive feedback via this platform.

In the absence of such reciprocal behavior through likes and positive comments on the child’s profile, this could lead to high risks of self-isolation, unhappiness, vulnerability, and feeling unaccepted by society.

“There could be many reasons a teenager would become depressed, anxious, or experience social phobias while using social media. In addition, there are just as many reasons why social media is enticing to a teen with an existing mental health issue,” Director of Clinical Outreach at Newport Academy, Kristen Wilson elaborated.

Numbers revealed that 92 percent of teens go online daily, with 24 expressing they go online almost constantly. This gave birth to an ambiguous correlation between the use of social media and how they feel.

Teenage participants who constantly check Instagram, and other social media platforms, experienced a much higher rate of depressive tendencies or feelings of loneliness than those who do not check these platforms.

In reality, frequent use of social media rewires the development of teens’ brains to endlessly seek gratification. And from here, we go back to the previously highlighted correlation between social media and brain wirings.

For a developing adolescent brain, being accepted on these platforms triggers activation in certain brain regions, similar to that of receiving money or any pleasantry. It is crucial to highlight that the brain is not biologically wired to receive positive feedback for any significant or insignificant act every couple of hours, or in social media’s instance, every minute. So, you can pin-point from there the heavy effect these platforms have on a developing brain.

This act on its own restructures the wiring of an adult brain, and for an adolescent one, the effect is certainly damaging. While these scenarios are hypothetical, one cannot deny that they are factual.

Social media is not an apparatus just lying there waiting to be used. On the contrary, the tool is already being used, and it is fulfilling its purpose to the highest levels. And how is that happening? By abusing your own psychology against you.

As adults, we are aware that this tool is causing problems because we were raised in a much more different state of mind, driven by different sociological and psychological circumstances. But for teenagers, these tools are the reality they grew up with, it’s the norm. And for that reason, they are more captivated by social media.

If a parent goes to their teenage child’s phone and tracks back their application usage, they will discover that the most used application is not an educational one, nor a gaming one. They will uncover that it’s one of the big-league social media platforms.

If it’s not Facebook, then it’s Instagram. If not Instagram, it’s Twitter or any other platform from the same family tree. Whatever it is, the factual aspect remains that it’s a social networking one. This alone projects the heavy reliance this young demographic has on these platforms, and this all could be traced back to the interchangeable brain wiring previously mentioned.

Let’s take for instance these platform’s model design, and the fundamental role marketing communication plays in leveraging users’ attention to their benefit. Instagram for example, delivered users with a bundle of what appeared like futuristic characteristics – in its early stages when it was released to the public in 2010.

Instagram took the world by a swift, and its popularity has been on an exponential rise since then, especially with teens. And all this can be attributed to its product design model. The cultural overtake of one platform changed the societal dynamic for this growing generation.

“You see landscapes, physical places, people, changing and altering themselves to be Instagrammable – to register a tinkle of attention,” according to a digital anthropologist at Curtin University, Dr. Crystal Abidin.

Instagram’s product design model is directed towards the volume of likes and comments – which is all associated with the positive feedback that pumps dopamine into the system – a hormone associated with pleasurable sensations.

The only thing companies such as Instagram will never publicize, is the psychological drawbacks of social media use that have attracted more attention in the past couple of years, with parents and ethical advocates highlighting an increase in anxiety and social isolation with teens.

The design model is based on three essential pillars, changing users’ behavior, altering their conceptualization, and transforming their personality. All these are directed to one purpose: presenting a forced and altered reality of the world, to keep users hooked.

While people are perceived as the ultimate social animals, such platforms have put us face-to-face with “social” technology that is pushing us further away from each other, by replacing the craved assurance of human interaction through these applications’ features, altering our interpretation of our humanness.

This gives birth to one cardinal hypothesis: Is digital innovation creating new boundaries for humanoid interactions?

The answer is quite simple: Yes and no.

Twelve years after its emergence, the internet has managed to sustain its stance by proving itself to be a powerhouse on the path of digital development, with the emergence of companies such as, Meta Inc. – formerly Facebook – and other social networking platforms.

The main, if not the only reason, allowing these platforms to abuse their power leading to exponential diminish of human interaction is the fact that they have the upper hand in controlling their effect on users, specifically upcoming generations.  

This segment of societal entities did not feel the pressure that comes from being forced to adapt to social norms, where they are physically disconnected from the world yet immensely connected at the same time.

Nowadays, teens do not feel the need to have a physical interaction with each other, given that the overtake of social networking platforms created some form of toxic adaptability of accepting humane remoteness.

As undeniable as it is, our day and age’s digital technology paved the way for accepting the substitution of human interaction with a technological one, be it with others, or ourselves. While some people are comfortable living an entire life without using any digital devices, the same cannot be said for much of the global population, especially the rising generation of the future.

Ethical Tech

How Technology is Steering us Towards Digital Totalitarianism

Published

 on

Digital Totalitarianism

Social media, the internet, and other digital tools, which were once hailed as great forces for human empowerment, connectivity, and liberation, have quickly come to be seen as a serious threat to democratic stability and human freedom. Social media platforms are demonstrating the potential to exacerbate risks such as authoritarian privacy violations, partisan echo chambers, and the spread of harmful disinformation because they are based on a seriously flawed business model. A number of other developments in digital technology, most notably the advent of artificial intelligence (AI), are also benefiting authoritarian forces. These changes have the potential to lead to digital totalitarianism that is much easier to slide into than to climb out of.

Social Media and Big Data

In the increasingly data-driven world, technology is everywhere. Numerous shopping apps use your phone’s GPS to determine your location, giving merchants the opportunity to send you advertisements as soon as you pass by their storefront. Retailers can charge you exactly the most you’re willing to spend on a given product, thanks to personalized pricing. Even at home, your personal information is not secure: Digital assistants like Amazon Alexa save your search history, so they are aware of all of your preferences, including music, travel habits, and specific shopping histories.

Employers are tracking and monitoring their employees using the latest technology. Biometric timecards that scan an employee’s fingerprint, hand shape, retina, or iris are being used by an increasing number of businesses. Sensors that monitor door opening and closing, vehicle engine activity, and seatbelt clicks are installed in UPS trucks. Amazon is filing a patent for an electronic wristband that tracks hand motions, ensuring, for example, that a warehouse worker is constantly moving boxes.

With a bit of sci-fi imagination and a quick glance to the other side of the planet (cough – China), one can easily see how these technologies together form a slippery slope towards digital totalitarianism.

During the Hong Kong protests, the Chinese government used information from video surveillance, face and license plate identification, mobile device locations, and official records to identify targets for imprisonment in Xinjiang, according to Human Rights Watch’s Maya Wang. The study is the most recent in a series that has highlighted the extensive use of sophisticated monitoring, more conventional security measures, and political indoctrination camps in the area, which has acted as a proving ground for methods and innovations later used elsewhere.

Social Credit Systems and Digital Totalitarianism

China’s extreme tech programs that border on digital totalitarianism are notorious. The country’s “social credit system” will track citizens’ behavior by 2020, keeping track of everything from speeding tickets to social media posts that are critical of the government. Then, everyone will be given a special “sincerity score”; a high score will be necessary for anyone hoping to obtain the best housing, set up the fastest Internet speeds, enroll their children in the most prestigious institutions, and obtain the most lucrative employment opportunities.

The system was originally designed to undertake financial and social assessments for corporations, government institutions, people, and non-governmental groups while standardizing the credit rating function. It can, however quickly evolve into a precisely effective method of digital totalitarianism when it becomes equally as restrictive as it is handy.

Such a system doesn’t even need to be directly enforced to be an effective social control tool, as friends and family members would govern each other’s behaviors in fear of the repercussions spilling over onto them, shaming and shunning their fellow citizens for speaking against government entities for fear of catching the algorithm’s ire.

Control over Information Highways

The internet runs on vast and interconnected infrastructural networks that are managed by tech and telecoms companies under strict government supervision and

This infrastructure underpins the highway on which all our information travels. Increasingly, it goes beyond just Facebook messages and emails. Payment gateways, access to news and information, education, and a rising number of jobs and careers depend completely on the maintenance of communication infrastructure.

The digital repression taking place in Myanmar is one example of how authoritarian states can leverage their control over such communication highways to stifle resistance. Some may see it as a great tool for maintaining order and ensuring security, while others may see it as an unacceptable and oppressive method or digital totalitarianism that will not be used against the people until it is.

In addition to regular internet outages, the junta, a military or political force that seized forceful control of a nation, and blocked access to social media sites. On February 4, Facebook, which has more than 22 million users in Myanmar, or roughly 40% of the population, was blocked. Before Facebook was banned, anti-coup activists frequently used it to plan large-scale acts of civil disobedience, such as doctors refusing to work in military hospitals and staging fake car accidents and sit-ins on trains to cause traffic.

After Facebook was banned in the country, protesters moved to Twitter to organize their acts, which was also blocked the next day. Later, on February 9, the junta proposed a cybersecurity law that, in accordance with Human Rights Watch, would “give it sweeping powers to access user data, block websites, order internet shutdowns, and imprison critics and officials at non-complying companies.”

Predictive AI as a Tool for Digital Totalitarianism

In the U.S, a “predictive policing” initiative conducted by the New Orleans Police Department creates a hot list of probable criminal offenders using Big Data. Quiet Skies, a TSA-run comprehensive technology initiative, analyzes and flags travelers based on “suspect” behavioral patterns. The last person to board their aircraft, change clothes in the toilet, or simply look at their reflection in a terminal glass might have a traveler on the Quiet Skies list.

Using such technology, A city’s location and crime rate may now be predicted with up to 90% accuracy by artificial intelligence one week in advance. The researchers that developed this AI assert that it can also be used to uncover those prejudices. Similar systems have been seen to reinforce racist bias in police, and the same may be true in this instance, especially since this data can be used to specify individuals with the most likelihood of committing a crime.

This would undoubtedly sound like good news for a head of a city police department as the allocation of scarce resources and manpower would be better used if the police knew preemptively where their forces would be needed. However, it can also be quite concerning in the hands of malicious actors, at the beck and call of a state hell-bent on the use of digital totalitarianism to meet their ends by any means necessary.

In all the aforementioned cases, it is not the technology itself that is destructive or evil in any way, but the debate arises when we ask the question: Can any person or entity, public or private, be trusted with such power? If yes, then who and what mechanisms are there in place to mitigate damages should they go rogue.


Inside Telecom provides you with an extensive list of content covering all aspects of the tech industry. Keep an eye on our Technology and Ethical Tech sections to stay informed and up-to-date with our daily articles.

Continue Reading

Ethical Tech

Distorting Reality of Sexual Abuse in the Metaverse

Published

 on

Sexual Abuse in the Metaverse

As a virtual world, the Metaverse is bound to witness such inappropriate occurrences. Again, I need to highlight this one more time; the issue is not really the Metaverse here; it is more the people using it and the companies developing it and their inability to protect their users. Sexual abuse in the Metaverse cannot be fully attributed to the company creating it as much as the people using it. The blame for such condemned and inappropriately conducted conduct falls on the company developing the virtual world alongside its failure to create a safe ecosystem that shields women from the improper and vulgar behavior they were exposed to in the virtual space. It is not a secret that technology has facilitated sexual violence, as digital technology is now considered one the leading facilitators of not only virtual sexual harassment and abuse but also it is leading to face-to-face sexuality-based harm.

Technology has brought endless possibilities of the utmost freedom to act as they please, and digital technologies are the leading facilitators of such conduct. At the moment, and since its emergence, the tech industry and its unlimited offerings to the world have seen almost no supervision from the right parties. This lack of privacy laws, self-regulation, and transparency has led to disturbing cases of ethically intolerable and improper occurrences within the industry. From there, we can establish that while the problem is occurring in the industry itself, the issue is not from the industry but from how people use and manipulate the offering of technological innovations.

Technology-Facilitated Sexual Harassment

Digital technologies have facilitated a wide range of sexual harassment behaviors such as online sexual harassment, gender, and sexuality-based harassment, cyberstalking, exploitation from shared photos, and more – and we’re not covering the Metaverse sexual abuse. I am still merely generalizing the improper conduct resulting from the industry itself.

Mainly facilitated through social media platforms such as Instagram and TikTok. Messaging platforms such as WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger, as well as dating applications such as Tinder and Bumble, sexual abuse in the Metaverse has been a growing problem that is heavily affecting the internet and bringing fundamental technological and social challenges.

We Need to Talk About Sexual Harassment in the Metaverse

It seems that Meta’s virtual reality platform Horizon World has been the hub for sexual harassment, exposing women to various provocations of sexual abuse in the Metaverse. Women are reporting cases of sexual abuse and even assault in the parallel universe. Numerous users have expressed discontent with the company’s lack of attentiveness in safeguarding their experience in Horizon World.

In 2021, numerous reports of sexual abuse in the Metaverse emerged, adding another layer of discomfort for women on the internet. “Not only was I groped last night, but there were people there who supported this behavior which made me feel isolated in the Plaza,” one woman expressed to one news outlet.

Women’s presence on the internet has constantly been exposed to such behavior and encounters, and virtual reality is just adding another layer of unpleasantness to its female users. While companies are maintaining their focus on the design model of the universe, one thing is not being taken into consideration on this account: the psychological effect of being exposed to such behavior.

Online watchdogs are increasing their reports of Metaverse sexual abuse. The numbers are on an exponential rise, with some reporting being virtually raped on the platform after one hour of entering the universe while another avatar was watching.

The problem here can be divided into two segments, the behavioral analysis of the users and the model design of Meta’s Horizon World. Given that it is quite impossible to have any control over the users’ use of the platform and their ethical conduct in the world, Meta, on the other hand, has not succeeded in delivering a secure and protected space for its female users before releasing the VR platform to the public.

When a woman gets assaulted in the Metaverse, this leaves a deeply rooted psychological effect on the person exposed to it. When a user initiates unsolicited sexual conduct on a female user in the virtual world, the person’s brain cannot differentiate between what is real and virtual as virtual reality connects the subconscious brain to the physical world. This creates a vivid association between what is happening in the virtual world and the real world.


Inside Telecom provides you with an extensive list of content covering all aspects of the Tech industry. Keep an eye on our ethical tech and Metaverse section to stay informed and updated with our daily article. 

Continue Reading

Ethical Tech

How Digital Marketing Pushes the Consumer to Buy Low-Quality Products

Published

 on

Inside Telecom provides you with an extensive list of content covering all aspects of the tech industry. Keep an eye on our Impact space to stay informed and up-to-date with our daily articles.

Online consumption is constantly mounting with the continuous availability and deliverance of the internet. The margin of individuals going online to satisfy their shopping itch is increasing daily, and digital marketing has a massive role to play here. By promoting a particular brand, digital marketing creates a familiar ground between the consumer and the brand by creating promotional messaging and measure that affects the consumers’ choice when buying – no matter the quality of the product. How digital marketing pushes the consumer to buy low-quality products is strictly associated with how the idea and the concept of the product are being delivered to the consumer through marketing campaigns appearing on any smart device that can display ads.

How Does Digital Marketing Affect Consumers? 

The effect of digital marketing on consumers can be solemnly affected by various factors, with the most bountiful one being the reviews. Digital marketing is significantly linked to the consumers’ assessments of a specific product, be it positive or negative. By doing so, digital marketing provides the consumers with the power of choice, delivering a personalized approach between the customer and the brand, which helps the companies providing the product to create a robust foundation with the customers. This plays a vital role in creating a solid base of loyal customers to the brand.

By implementing the right digital marketing strategy, brands can advantage the human psyche to their benefit by manipulating the users’ reaction to their products, whether high or low-quality products.

Creating the right balance in ad frequency is one of the key pillars for constructing the right digital marketing strategy in any campaign. While rarely at the forefront of the marketing process, ad frequency sets the first stone in any marketing campaign.

Advertising frequency is responsible for the intensity of targeted ads for users, strategically directing consumers to specific products through the deliverance of a solid brand recall, driving higher conversion rates. Ads frequency specifies the margin of ads a consumer is exposed to during a certain period of time and the intensity of ads served for one user. 

After the COVID-19 pandemic took over the world, marketing approaches drastically changed to accommodate the hasty adoption of digital transformation on a global scale. The marketing landscape rode the wave of digitalization to sustain its evolvement and effectiveness. Nowadays, more advertisers are directing their attention toward developing a more organized and structured campaign that promotes high engagement with the brand instead of focusing on increasing impressions or clicks on their products.

This approach helps marketing campaigns identify the intensity of users and how many times they were reached. By creating a suitable base of impressions by increasing the number of unique users, only then will advertisers be able to increase the frequency of visits to a particular product for the brand.

While the strategy is deemed as one of the most optimal adopted strategies, from the users’ perspective, it does not differentiate in the quality of the product. The party in complete control of the situation is the brand and the advertising expert, while the consumer can fall victim to directed advertising. Advertising frequency does not provide the consumer with enough information about the products being promoted in the ads. 

Using the psyche of human behavior to direct users’ attention to certain ads will only push the consumer to intensity their engagement with the product on a daily basis, with no guarantee of the nature and quality of the product. The consumer sees what the brand and advertisers want them to see. This means that most of the time, they hold the winning card, and the consumer can easily fall for marketing manipulation through ad frequency and buy a product that does not meet the standards.

What is the Biggest Problem in Digital Marketing?

Today’s world is experiencing drastic and fundamental shifts in dynamics between the traditional and digital approaches to managing, promoting, and advertising businesses. In comparison, some might think that digital marketing is hitting its highest success points today. The fact is that developing the right digital marketing strategy does not come without challenges, as there is always room to improve to fulfill its goals.

One of the most prominent problems is finding the right volume intensity when reaching out to consumers. The digital world’s flourishing in almost every aspect drives brands to expand their horizons when marketing their products, which requires finding and directing their strategies to the right volume of consumers. With the increasing importance of brands adopting the digital marketing approach to reach the masses, advertisers are now bedeviled with the challenges of making their brand distinctively catch the eye of the correct mass of potential customers.

Once identifying the correct mass for the brand is established comes the part of driving relevant traffic to the brand’s website. Setting the right volume of consumers is not enough, as the step that follows is what truly institutes a loyal volume of consumers for the brand. Most advertisers fall into the trap of attracting the right volume of consumers and forget to develop a complementary strategy to drive relevant traffic to the website by spreading awareness to the right target market.

Steering the digital marketing campaigns to focus on facing these two challenges will place advertisers in a position of strength when they direct the right users’ attention towards their product by comprehending which channel is the right one to drive the relevant audience to their website to turn them into loyal consumers, no matter the quality of the product.

Final Words

The impact of how digital marketing pushes the consumer to buy low-quality products heavily relies on consumers’ behavior. It’s affecting how interested buyers deal with the brand and their product. The effect of digital marketing on users’ behavior is fashioning how the tech industry is driving businesses worldwide to alter their approaches to meet the new norms of digital advertising. With users spending more time on social media and other applications, it has become harder to differentiate between good and bad quality products from just looking at a post or its sell-through statement. Digital marketing is enabling a drastic shift in power between the consumer and the brand’s advertisers. Now, the brand has more control over the users’ perception of the product’s quality, and from there, indirectly shifting the consumers’ awareness of the quality of the product they are presenting.


Inside Telecom provides you with an extensive list of content covering all aspects of the tech industry. Keep an eye on our Impact space to stay informed and up-to-date with our daily articles.

Continue Reading

Trending